Samir Amin is a French fighting maoist and economist. Amin, born in Cairo, 1931 died on August 12, 2018. Samir Amin is in the first place to explain broker capitalism after Mao. Amin says, 'Bourgeoisie can not fulfill its role in the process of production of absolute freedom, but that broker is capitalism.'
He criticized Wallist, who brought the theory of world order, and has brought the principles of sovereignty into the world. According to political analyst Hari Sharma, a program organized by the Nepal Study Center organized in Hardik Hotel of Kathmandu, it has been suggested that Samir Amin has been told about his death.
The thing is starting from Andre Andreus Freak. The work of these principles appears Latin America experience. There is an European ideology called World System Theory. Wallstein is considered as the father of this theory. Andre Gundred Freak is an important contributor to this theory. The Latin American system is very interesting by Andre Andreus Freayank. Samin Amin has criticized the famous Marxist commentator. Latin America has a glorious history. The countries in the colonial colonies of the world did not imagine freedom, but they had sought demand for independence in Latin America. Latin America has experienced about 300 years of selfishness struggle.
Haiti's revolutionary format the first constitution of black nations. But why did the awakened countries go poorly so poor?
The importance of seeing development in the debate of development is considered to be important. Therefore development is also required to define what it means. The progress of the development has been lost since the last time the development debate started coming around the world. Growth of development has not only influenced the political-economy but also a social social concern. Therefore, the early stage independence of the early Latin America, special Caribbean countries, can not be seen by today's development method. The constitution of Haiti had come to the world before the French Revolution, which is going to change the world's face. But even in development, Haiti is far behind.
Therefore, today the evolution of the evolution that we read as being read or given today can not explain the hypothesis of Haiti or the Venezuela revolution in the past.
How do we look at ideas and organizations in Samir Amin's worksheet? What relationship is there between ideas and organizations? How many organizations protect the organization, and how many assumptions protect the organization? Such as discussion. From these angles, Samir should be theoretical and scientific discussion of Amin.
In the days of Samir Amin, Europe was not as open as the present, but it was very complicated in the rotation. If he talked about a passport, he did not have a ban on national enclosures from Egypt to study there.
Some of the philosophical, political principles of that time, came out of Africa. For example, Alberto can be taken into action. He is the production of African colonialism. If we look at the flame, it seems from the attraction of African colonialism. Now what we think now is to understand what to know in Harvard, Princeton, Oxford. But their concerns were the third world reference.
When the person is moving, he does not forget where I am from. Some say it as nationalism too. Someone calls it this conventional conventional tradition.
Whatever nationality in Nepal defines, our definition of nationalism has come from cultural rains. We are going through a narrow path on culturally to take liberal shape.
Marsism was a scientific study of Samir Amin's discovery. How to view the society? How did society become the origin? He wrote on this question and wrote. But now we have stopped asking. Samir Amin, who continued for 85 years, continued to struggle with cultural affliction, and remained unstoppable in his stand, we could not forget that endless attachment. He wanted to change society. Where do i come from Where do I go to my society? That was what inspired him.
Even though talking about materialism, however, a person reflects the importance of spiritualism somewhere. In this regard, I remember Hegel. Where did the ghost of that struggle be fulfilled? He studied the university. Returned to Egypt and worked. Reactions to Egypt. Went to gardener Mali worked on the Planning Commission. Looks like we were in a similar way. I have seen that he is a consultant. But he never stopped asking questions. If we have to learn what to make meaningful, political, social life, we do not leave the question.
But not all people should continue to persist. People have the right to tackle. But if we can not protect our shadow and ourselves, it loses.
Samir Amin was not thirsty. Continue continuously. That was a very important thing. I do not think he could carry a gun. But she does not mean that she was not an employee. He was a great deal of thought. It is his shadow that we learn from his life.
Did I show the light in front of the sun, but not what many macro-friendly friends should ask for, what is the analysis of your materialism? If Marcus has history of the public, is it possible to make a worldwide application possible? We always say that the center is capable, but 'purifiers' also change the character of the center.
You imagine the spherical imagination as a focal point. Do not imagine the line. When Samir Amin talked about WW Rusto's analysis at the starting stage of the Communist Economic Declaration, 'Are we going by stepping up as a steady development?'
If you want to imagine the focal point, then the center point comes first or does not come back. In my opinion, the extent of the development of the Marxism which is at the point of development, not limited to Marxism. The possibility of Marxism was opened. Where many of our friends have studied in Nepal second generation study. Today, social science is not the consciousness of Central Department. He explained how to understand his society while planning a course.
In the 70s, David Seddon's Workers in Nepal The Crisis Theory also said that the crisis of Marxism was more than discipline theory. If you read the crisis in Nepal, the first chapter comes with a crisis of discipline. Because they are a student of human origin, human beings talk about discipline. But how to explain it when Marsism is a matter of read it in a rotate manner? Because every society is able to explain its positive theory, whether it is a global and powerful principle of a relationship, Mars says that. Because the society has the desire to do so.
Where was the suggestion and that the society went ahead. Capitalism and colonization went along. Later on, empire went to another empire and it came from the west. After that we started to grow in the development name somewhere. But what happens when the internal game is different, every society is different and every environment is different. He started mediating. Let's say to you, not the taste of America's Mac Donald and the Dinner's food in India is different. International can be a standard, because in every place, 'I Have Help You Want What Do You Want to Others' talk about the same line. But Mac Donald's taste began to vary.
MacDonald's specialty was changed to Indians. Who did it taste as much as possible. The man asked. Now our globalization has become valuable when our time comes. Your salvage commodity has begun to sleep in Paris. By evaluating fashion, globalization in three concepts of Samin Amin and global capitalism say it upsets. So, seeing man's choice and interest is in profit. But what, capitalism itself is adjusted by itself. It does what you need. So, what is the difference between the center and the edge of the Andragandra franc, so that the people of the center command us and the center simply tells us the attraction. We go to slavery. Samir Amin says that there is no slavery. There is a possibility of resistance.
When I read Samir Amin, my thoughts are gidding and what is important to us, what does that affect the infection when it comes from one step to another stage? If the trademarks say Marxism, the steps come. It has a Agenda of the World War. She satisfies and takes it. The structure of the structure will be accessible as the VanGird Party will be strengthened. The discussion of agency and structure is very important. Samir Amin says that infection is part of the knowledge of Marcus. We discuss very little. What are some of the conversations going from one step to another step? What kind of fluorescence does appear? In legal view, the modernity of the modernity makes modernity modern. Modernity is not discussed in Marxism. From the Remin Williams to the others, the modernity and Marxism are taken together.
But modern political economics do not matter much. So what is the intervention element to understand infection? What is the main factor in taking the steps from one step to another? Not a party too. Because local diversity is. The variety of resistance from such diversity is also varied.
I think Samin Amin is a diversityist. Samir Amin has known diversity. So the understanding of that social movement in my understanding and in my studies is very low. The workers' movement is said, but due to capitalism, the new social movement came. Such as the environment. The traditional method can not imagine the environmental movement, whether our dalit movement is a safe movement or not? It is the challenge in Nepal to see how we recognize the movement of identity. In the meantime, we praised the movement of identity, and social mobility has become so strong that we have reached the name of identity movement only.
I think Nepal's Marxist crisis is in danger. If there is a chance to read from Samir Amin, the movements are very rare. Every person speaks, and in the same way we have caught in a slogan of prosperity. How can that sound sound come to prosperity? What is that, when it comes from one level to another level, brings different issues due to the respectful effect. I think Maxim never closes the possibility of change. But if we just want to find out the probability of searching, I think we will do wrong.
Transitions and probability change occur. Suppose I have to go out today, from here I am very impressed if there comes out there. There are many ways to get there. It is my choice to know which route to go. But on leadership, he is here traffic, says that you go from here. But I'm out of the way, I go to Gemstone, what if it comes to getting a car? What freedom of human rights can the power of control have to control? I think the issue of social movements is the same.
Even when reading Samir Amin, when he read the book about Marxism, he also praised him that he was a Maoist. When I read a small book called Marxism, I did not see Mao. The challenge was that the non-traditional society, i.e. in Europe, the industrial revolution like institution and thought marx were in the stage of revolution. Chaina was not a industrial revolution. There is the present.
The Chinese revolution has become possible from the strong struggle of the local. Mao had to come back if he was waiting for the layers to make the industrialists another way, but he did that, if he had read revolutionary possibilities worldwide, he was from the Soviet Union. That is why there is a possibility of revolution. It is a stress that our freedom is not to ask for our autonomy. I am a liberal study. If I created myself a system slave, now that the system searches for it, then that system should wait. Who makes that system? Now this global capitalism is neutral and there is a lot of things here. Which System Has We Heloved?
Years in the Communist Party's Documents. To define Nepal It is feudal, semi-seminars, colonies, new colonies. This movement has been erased until the age of old age is broken. Therefore, despite being the greatest three principles in Marxistism, history can be terrorist. Like this, it's an important event, to stop trying to get communist changes among us? Between this was a good understanding of what was the social situation of our society? How can we change it? What is the work of a Communist Leader? It is his job to infringe the desire of change within each person. The sense of duality, the duality of duality does not mean that it should be communist.
Everyone wants freedom, thinking. I think that I am free. I did not talk to Jogi. Everyone wants to be free from slavery of daily life. The leader may be communist but the movement should be left. For that I remember Samir Amin. The freedom of every human being is the desire of immunity from slavery; the equality of equality is to do the work of the true Communist.
But what we do is ban on the name of the idea. That's exactly what we hear. So, how can my heartfelt blessing be opened in the ears, how can we open ears? How we will have to open the ears of people. The biggest thing is that in the current context, the Communists' biggest friends have blinded their cause.
Their eyes should be opened. Ears should be heard You can not say because you have a discipline. But I must say. Such a storm has increased, no matter where that column comes from, neither one form of it can be found in the social media. Are our brothers I might be that, but what is true, in true Communist, true revolutionary had to be left with that true feeling. At that same time, Samin Amin lived with that promise till that age.
Today we have to learn with Amin Samir, the ones you learn to be a true Communist. I can learn to learn that I can represent the free people, honestly. With the use of language, with the use of ideas, objective objective, in the north, Nepali society is in favor of freedom. Parity is in favor of This is not a favorable thing. That's why diversity is our reality. How can we increase it? In that case, we need to look at the physical situation to analyze.